Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of Existing Risk Screening Tools

From: Choosing the most appropriate existing type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool for use in the Philippines: a case-control study with an urban Filipino population

Risk Assessment Tool Cut-off a Risk Score Number with Dys-glycemia (True Positive)
n = 71
Number with Normal FBS (True Negative)
n = 129
Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV LR+ LR -
CANRISK ≥ 33 +
-
61
10
59
70
0.86 0.54 0.20 0.92 1.88 0.26
FINDRISC ≥ 15 +
-
67
4
71
58
0.94 0.45 0.20 0.95 1.72 0.13
ADA ≥ 3 +
-
61
10
67
62
0.86 0.48 0.19 0.93 1.65 0.29
IDRS ≥ 60 +
-
65
6
81
48
0.92 0.37 0.19 0.96 1.46 0.23
Indonesian ≥ 14 +
-
63
8
85
44
0.89 0.34 0.18 0.96 1.35 0.33
Filipino ≥ 21 b +
-
48
23
35
94
0.68 0.73 0.27 0.92 2.49 0.45
  1. FBS fasting blood sugar, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, LR+ positive likelihood ratio, LR- negative likelihood ratio
  2. a High or very high risk of undiagnosed diabetes or for developing diabetes
  3. b Average total points for a diabetic (not stated as a cut-off)