Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of Existing Risk Screening Tools

From: Choosing the most appropriate existing type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool for use in the Philippines: a case-control study with an urban Filipino population

Risk Assessment Tool

Cut-off a

Risk Score

Number with Dys-glycemia (True Positive)

nā€‰=Ā 71

Number with Normal FBS (True Negative)

nā€‰=Ā 129

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

LR+

LR -

CANRISK

ā‰„ 33

+

-

61

10

59

70

0.86

0.54

0.20

0.92

1.88

0.26

FINDRISC

ā‰„ 15

+

-

67

4

71

58

0.94

0.45

0.20

0.95

1.72

0.13

ADA

ā‰„ 3

+

-

61

10

67

62

0.86

0.48

0.19

0.93

1.65

0.29

IDRS

ā‰„ 60

+

-

65

6

81

48

0.92

0.37

0.19

0.96

1.46

0.23

Indonesian

ā‰„ 14

+

-

63

8

85

44

0.89

0.34

0.18

0.96

1.35

0.33

Filipino

ā‰„ 21 b

+

-

48

23

35

94

0.68

0.73

0.27

0.92

2.49

0.45

  1. FBS fasting blood sugar, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, LR+ positive likelihood ratio, LR- negative likelihood ratio
  2. a High or very high risk of undiagnosed diabetes or for developing diabetes
  3. b Average total points for a diabetic (not stated as a cut-off)