In defense of sugar: a critical analysis of rhetorical strategies used in The Sugar Association’s award-winning 1976 public relations campaign
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Dec 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Feb 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Pomeranz|
|4 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nalini Ranjit|
|5 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Cristin Kearns|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Pomeranz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|22 Aug 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12889-019-7401-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.