Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: In defense of sugar: a critical analysis of rhetorical strategies used in The Sugar Association’s award-winning 1976 public relations campaign

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
17 Dec 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Pomeranz
4 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nalini Ranjit
5 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Cristin Kearns
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Pomeranz
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
22 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12889-019-7401-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.