Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Public health effects of gambling – debate on a conceptual model

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Oct 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Tiina Latvala
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Derevensky
3 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Abbott
31 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Tiina Latvala
Resubmission - Version 3
31 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Abbott
27 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Tiina Latvala
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Tiina Latvala
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Tiina Latvala
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
9 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement