Understanding the unintended consequences of public health policies: the views of policymakers and evaluators
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 May 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Purtle|
|16 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Harris|
|7 Nov 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Kathryn Oliver|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Nov 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Purtle|
|25 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|22 Jul 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Kathryn Oliver|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Jul 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12889-019-7389-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.