Skip to main content

Table 2 Relative risk of typology membership according to ecological correlates

From: Ecological correlates of activity-related behavior typologies among adolescents

  Model 1a
RR (95%CI)
Model 2b
RR (95%CI)
Typology 1
Physically inactive, highly sedentary (Ref)
Typology 2
Moderately active, high screen-time
Typology 3
Highly active, low sedentary
Typology 1
Physically inactive, highly sedentary (Ref)
Typology 2
Moderately active, high screen-time
Typology 3
Highly active, low sedentary
Intrapersonal
 Self-efficacy for physical activity 1.00 1.02 (1.00–1.05)* 1.13 (1.06–1.21)* 1.00 1.03 (0.99–1.06) 1.08 (1.00–1.16)*
 Enjoyment of sedentary behaviors 1.00 1.22 (0.95–1.56) 1.02 (0.82–1.27) 1.00 N/A N/A
 Sport competence 1.00 1.01 (0.99–1.05) 1.11 (1.04–1.18)* 1.00 0.98 (0.93–1.03) 1.00 (0.93–1.08)
 Cons of physical activity 1.00 0.95 (0.90–1.01) 0.88 (0.81–0.95)* 1.00 0.95 (0.93–1.03) 0.98 (0.87–1.10)
 Pros of physical activity 1.00 1.02 (0.93–1.12) 1.12 (1.02–1.24)* 1.00 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 0.98 (0.84–1.15)
Interpersonal
 Screen-time restriction rules 1.00 1.05 (0.97–1.14) 1.41 (1.19–1.67)* 1.00 1.03 (0.92–1.14) 1.32 (1.06–1.64)*
 Sibling screen-time co-participation 1.00 1.09 (0.93–1.27) 1.22 (1.08–1.37)* 1.00 1.08 (0.92–1.26) 1.26 (1.08–1.46)*
 Parent/guardian screen-time co-participation 1.00 1.07 (0.97–1.19) 1.13 (0.99–1.29) 1.00 N/A N/A
 Friend screen-time co-participation 1.00 1.14 (1.04–1.26)* 1.05 (0.90–1.24) 1.00 1.14 (1.00–1.30)* 1.01 (0.85–1.20)
 Parental support for physical activity 1.00 1.06 (1.01–1.12)* 1.23 (1.15–1.31)* 1.00 1.03 (0.96–1.11) 1.15 (1.03–1.28)*
 Friend/sibling support for physical activity 1.00 1.10 (1.02–1.18)* 1.19 (1.08–1.32)* 1.00 1.06 (0.97–1.17) 1.04 (0.87–1.24)
Physical environmental
 Access to screen based items in bedroom 1.00 1.03 (0.92–1.17) 1.03 (0.85–1.24) 1.00 N/A N/A
 Availability of options for physical activity in home environment 1.00 1.06 (0.96–1.16) 1.31 (1.16–1.47)* 1.00 1.04 (0.94–1.14) 1.12 (0.95–1.33)
 Perceived neighborhood road safety 1.00 1.01 (0.97–1.06) 1.10 (1.05–1.16)* 1.00 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 1.10 (1.01–1.18)*
 Perceived neighborhood crime safety 1.00 1.02 (0.99–1.05) 0.97 (0.92–1.02) 1.00 N/A N/A
 GIS: Count of private/public recreation land 1.00 1.06 (0.97–1.17) 1.15 (0.98–1.35) 1.00 N/A N/A
 GIS: Count of public trails 1.00 1.20 (0.84–1.72) 1.07 (0.66–1.76) 1.00 N/A N/A
 GIS: Count of public parks 1.00 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 1.00 N/A N/A
 GIS: Density of public transportation 1.00 1.01 (0.99–1.02) 1.00 (0.97–1.03) 1.00 N/A N/A
  1. aAdjusted for sex and accounting for clustering by school; bAdditionally adjusted for all variables significant in unadjusted analyses; *p < 0.05; NA – was not included in the model due to non-significant results in the unadjusted model; GIS: Geographic Information Systems