Skip to main content

Table 2 Relative risk of typology membership according to ecological correlates

From: Ecological correlates of activity-related behavior typologies among adolescents

 

Model 1a

RR (95%CI)

Model 2b

RR (95%CI)

Typology 1

Physically inactive, highly sedentary (Ref)

Typology 2

Moderately active, high screen-time

Typology 3

Highly active, low sedentary

Typology 1

Physically inactive, highly sedentary (Ref)

Typology 2

Moderately active, high screen-time

Typology 3

Highly active, low sedentary

Intrapersonal

 Self-efficacy for physical activity

1.00

1.02 (1.00–1.05)*

1.13 (1.06–1.21)*

1.00

1.03 (0.99–1.06)

1.08 (1.00–1.16)*

 Enjoyment of sedentary behaviors

1.00

1.22 (0.95–1.56)

1.02 (0.82–1.27)

1.00

N/A

N/A

 Sport competence

1.00

1.01 (0.99–1.05)

1.11 (1.04–1.18)*

1.00

0.98 (0.93–1.03)

1.00 (0.93–1.08)

 Cons of physical activity

1.00

0.95 (0.90–1.01)

0.88 (0.81–0.95)*

1.00

0.95 (0.93–1.03)

0.98 (0.87–1.10)

 Pros of physical activity

1.00

1.02 (0.93–1.12)

1.12 (1.02–1.24)*

1.00

0.96 (0.85–1.09)

0.98 (0.84–1.15)

Interpersonal

 Screen-time restriction rules

1.00

1.05 (0.97–1.14)

1.41 (1.19–1.67)*

1.00

1.03 (0.92–1.14)

1.32 (1.06–1.64)*

 Sibling screen-time co-participation

1.00

1.09 (0.93–1.27)

1.22 (1.08–1.37)*

1.00

1.08 (0.92–1.26)

1.26 (1.08–1.46)*

 Parent/guardian screen-time co-participation

1.00

1.07 (0.97–1.19)

1.13 (0.99–1.29)

1.00

N/A

N/A

 Friend screen-time co-participation

1.00

1.14 (1.04–1.26)*

1.05 (0.90–1.24)

1.00

1.14 (1.00–1.30)*

1.01 (0.85–1.20)

 Parental support for physical activity

1.00

1.06 (1.01–1.12)*

1.23 (1.15–1.31)*

1.00

1.03 (0.96–1.11)

1.15 (1.03–1.28)*

 Friend/sibling support for physical activity

1.00

1.10 (1.02–1.18)*

1.19 (1.08–1.32)*

1.00

1.06 (0.97–1.17)

1.04 (0.87–1.24)

Physical environmental

 Access to screen based items in bedroom

1.00

1.03 (0.92–1.17)

1.03 (0.85–1.24)

1.00

N/A

N/A

 Availability of options for physical activity in home environment

1.00

1.06 (0.96–1.16)

1.31 (1.16–1.47)*

1.00

1.04 (0.94–1.14)

1.12 (0.95–1.33)

 Perceived neighborhood road safety

1.00

1.01 (0.97–1.06)

1.10 (1.05–1.16)*

1.00

1.02 (0.95–1.09)

1.10 (1.01–1.18)*

 Perceived neighborhood crime safety

1.00

1.02 (0.99–1.05)

0.97 (0.92–1.02)

1.00

N/A

N/A

 GIS: Count of private/public recreation land

1.00

1.06 (0.97–1.17)

1.15 (0.98–1.35)

1.00

N/A

N/A

 GIS: Count of public trails

1.00

1.20 (0.84–1.72)

1.07 (0.66–1.76)

1.00

N/A

N/A

 GIS: Count of public parks

1.00

0.99 (0.98–1.01)

0.99 (0.96–1.02)

1.00

N/A

N/A

 GIS: Density of public transportation

1.00

1.01 (0.99–1.02)

1.00 (0.97–1.03)

1.00

N/A

N/A

  1. aAdjusted for sex and accounting for clustering by school; bAdditionally adjusted for all variables significant in unadjusted analyses; *p < 0.05; NA – was not included in the model due to non-significant results in the unadjusted model; GIS: Geographic Information Systems