Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Global comparison of cancer outcomes: standardization and correlation with healthcare expenditures

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Feb 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Eaglehouse
28 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Polesel Jerry
2 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Horace CW Choi
Resubmission - Version 2
2 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Eaglehouse
28 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Polesel Jerry
9 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Horace CW Choi
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Eaglehouse
13 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Polesel Jerry
17 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Horace CW Choi
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Eaglehouse
23 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Horace CW Choi
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
7 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12889-019-7384-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement