Skip to main content

Table 8 Ratings matrix of distinguishing constructs from qualitative analysis

From: Mixed methods evaluation of implementation and outcomes in a community-based cancer prevention intervention

 

Low Implementation Programs

High Implementation Programs

 

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

 

Intervention Characteristics

 Design Quality & Packaging

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

X

+ 1

+ 2

X

−1

+ 1

+ 1*

+ 2

X

*

Inner Setting

 Compatibility

+ 2

+ 1

+ 2

+ 1

+ 2

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 2

*

 Access to Knowledge & Information

+ 2

0

+ 1

+ 1

X

−1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

− 1

+ 1*

*

Characteristics of Individuals

 Other Personal Attributes

+ 1

M

+ 1

M

+ 1

+ 2

0

−1

+ 1

M

+ 2

− 1

X

*

Process

 Executing

X

−1

+ 1*

−1

−2

− 1

−1

− 1

X

+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

− 1

**

 External Change Agents

+ 1

+ 1

+ 2

M

0

X

+ 1

+ 1*

+ 2

+ 1

+ 2

M

+ 2

**

 Formally Appointed External Implementation Leader

+ 1

−1

−1

−1*

M

−2

−2

−1

− 1

−1

X

−1

+ 1*

*

Other

 Experience

−1

+ 1

+ 1

0

M

−2

M

+ 1

M

+ 2

+ 2

−2

+ 1

**

  1. Key:Rating + or – indicates valence of the construct on implementation, and 1 or 2 indicates the magnitude of the construct in the program; * after the rating indicates that the construct was mixed but was slightly more positive or negative; 0 represents a neutral influence on implementation; X indicates mixed influence on implementation; M indicates missing; construct was not present in the interview; * in the final column indicates a weakly distinguishing construct; ** in the final column indicates a strongly distinguishing construct