Skip to main content

Table 5 Associations between perceived criminality (by type of crime) at neighbourhood level, feeling unsafe (at night) and self-rated health

From: Assessing the role of criminality in neighbourhood safety feelings and self-reported health: results from a cross-sectional study in a Dutch municipality

 

Base model:

Perception of each type of crime included in a separate model

Variation 1:

Multivariable model including thefts, burglaries, violent crimes, traffic nuisance, vandalism (excluded: nuisance)

Variation 2:

Multivariable model including thefts, burglaries, traffic nuisance, nuisance, vandalism (excluded: violent crimes)

Base model:

Perception of each type of crime included in a separate model

 

Feeling unsafe

Feeling unsafe at night

Feeling unsafe

Feeling unsafe at night

Feeling unsafe

Feeling unsafe at night

Poor health

N included in the model

between 5154 and 8026

between 5219 and 8129

4574

4626

4429

4478

between 5237 and 8216

 

Feel unsafe vs feel safe

OR [95% CI]

Poor vs good health

OR [95% CI]

Perceived frequency of thefts

1.84 [1.63;2.07]

1.79 [1.61;2.00]

1.15 [1.11;1.20]

1.15 [1.10;1.20]

1.13 [1.08;1.17]

1.11 [1.07;1.16]

1.06 [0.98;1.14]

Perceived frequency of burglaries

1.22 [1.00;1.48]

1.19 [0.98;1.45]

1.04 [1.02;1.07]

1.05 [1.02;1.08]

1.06 [1.03;1.09]

1.06 [1.03;1.08]

1.07 [0.98;1.16]

Perceived frequency of violent crimes

2.29 [2.00;2.63]

2.09 [1.81;2.41]

1.27 [1.22;1.32]

1.18 [1.12;1.23]

Not includeda

Not includeda

1.14 [1.04;1.26]

Perceived frequency of traffic nuisance

1.83 [1.55;2.15]

1.64 [1.39;1.93]

1.13 [1.11;1.16]

1.10 [1.07;1.12]

1.11 [1.09;1.14]

1.08 [1.05;1.11]

1.15 [1.06; 1.24]

Perceived frequency of nuisance caused by neighbours

1.91 [1.61;2.26]

1.87 [1.63;2.16]

Not includeda

Not includeda

1.39 [1.33;1.46]

1.33 [1.26;1.41]

1.03 [0.95;1.13]

Perceived frequency of vandalism

1.69 [1.48;1.94]

1.52 [1.34;1.72]

1.03 [1.01;1.05]

1.03 [1.01;1.05]

1.02 [1.00;1.05]

1.02 [1.00;1.04]

1.04 [0.96;1.13]

  1. Results from multilevel logistic regression models (individuals clustered in the neighbourhoods); Perceived safety factors are scored on the scale from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); n range 5219–8129. All models adjusted for age, gender, education, income and the difference between neighbourhood mean and individual score for each factor
  2. aFrequency of violent crimes and nuisance could not be added to the model at the same time due to collinearity problem
  3. Significant estimates (at 5% level) are in bold.