Skip to main content

Table 2 Potential progression criteria used to monitor interventions

From: Use of progression criteria to support monitoring and commissioning decision making of public health services: lessons from Better Start Bradford

Progression criteria

Description

Example targets

Recruitment

Family/parent/child enrolment

Number of women enrolled on to a programme per year

Reach

Enrolment of population with intended characteristics

Sample representative of population ethnicity (White British: 25%, Pakistani: 50%, Eastern European: 10%)

Implementation

Activities designed to deliver the intervention

Number of volunteers trained to deliver peer support

Satisfaction

Family/parent/child satisfaction with intervention content and/or delivery

Percentage of parents recommending a course in response to Friends and Family test

Completion

Intervention completion / attendance rate

Proportion of families attending at least 5/8 sessions

Fidelity

Extent to which intervention is delivered as intended

Percentage of women receiving continuity of care from a midwife

Data quality

Quality of data routinely collected by intervention teams

Proportion of missing/incomplete data from questionnaires