Skip to main content

Table 2 The adjusted differences between the intervention and control sites at baseline and follow-up

From: The impact of a new exercise facility on physical activity at the community level: a non-randomized panel study in Japan

Items Intervention site Control site Adjusted differences between the intervention and control sites: Odds ratios (95%CI) b
Baseline
n = 821
Follow-up
n = 1018
Change a Baseline
n = 845
Follow-up
n = 924
Change a Baseline Follow-up
% of those who met the PA guideline 20.2 18.5 −1.7 23.2 21.1 −2.1 0.80 (0.63, 1.01)† 0.83 (0.66, 1.04)
% of those who engaged in MVPA 42.6 39.6 −3.0 44.5 43.3 −1.2 0.95 (0.78, 1.16) 0.88 (0.73, 1.05)
% of those who perceived availability of PA facilities 76.4 81.2 4.8 68.2 67.0 −1.2 1.59 (1.28, 1.99)** 2.34 (1.89, 2.90)**
% of those who were aware of others being active 85.7 87.8 2.1 89.8 88.4 −1.4 0.71 (0.52, 0.96)* 1.02 (0.77, 1.35)
% of those who were willing to engage in PA 87.0 85.0 −2.0 87.5 86.6 −0.9 1.04 (0.77, 1.39) 0.94 (0.72, 1.22)
  1. p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01
  2. a Follow-up minus baseline
  3. b Analyses adjusted for gender, age, education level, marital status, employment status, BMI, and self-rated health (reference: control site)