Skip to main content

Table 2 Perceived Health and Economic Impacts of Tax in Seattle Overall and by Income Level

From: Perceptions of the possible health and economic impacts of Seattle’s sugary beverage tax

 

Overall

< 260% FPL

≥ 260% FPL

p value

(N = 851)a,b

(N = 395)a

(N = 456)a

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

 

Opinion on Taxb

 Approve

59% (55, 63%)

52% (46, 58%)

63% (58, 68%)

0.021

 Disapprove

37% (33, 41%)

43% (37, 48%)

33% (28, 38%)

 

 Don’t know

4.4% (3.0, 6.3%)

5.4% (3.2, 9.0%)

3.8% (2.3, 6.2%)

 

Child Well Beingc

 Tax will improve child health and wellbeing

59% (55, 63%)

53% (47, 59%)

62% (57, 67%)

0.021

 Tax will not improve child health and wellbeing

37% (34, 41%)

41% (36, 47%)

35% (30, 40%)

 

 Don’t know

3.9% (2.6, 5.6%)

5.8% (3.5, 9.5%)

2.8% (1.6, 4.9%)

 

Public Healthc

 Tax will improve public health

56% (52, 60%)

48% (42, 53%)

61% (55, 66%)

<0.001*

 Tax will not improve public health

40% (36, 44%)

46% (40, 52%)

37% (32, 42%)

 

 Don’t know

4.3% (3.0, 6.1%)

5.4% (3.2, 9.0%)

2.9% (1.6, 5.0%)

 

Seattle’s Economyc

 Tax will have a positive effect on the economy

47% (44, 51%)

44% (38, 50%)

50% (44, 55%)

0.31

 Tax will have a negative effect on the economy

35% (32, 39%)

37% (31, 43%)

35% (30, 40%)

 

 Don’t know

17% (15, 20%)

19% (15, 24%)

16% (13, 20%)

 

Cross-Border Shoppingc

 Participant will not cross-border shop

77% (74, 80%)

72% (67, 77%)

80% (76, 84%)

<0.001*

 Participant will cross-border shop

20% (17, 23%)

21% (17, 27%)

19% (15, 24%)

 

 Don’t know

2.9% (1.8, 4.5%)

6.1% (3.7, 9.9%)

1.0% (0.39, 2.4%)

 

Small Businessesc

 Tax will not negatively affect small businesses

52% (48, 56%)

47% (42, 53%)

55% (50, 60%)

0.096

 Tax will negatively affect small businesses

39% (35, 43%)

42% (36, 47%)

37% (32, 42%)

 

 Don’t know

9.0% (7.0, 11%)

11% (8.0, 15%)

7.7% (5.4, 11%)

 

Job Lossc

 Tax will not result in job loss

66% (62, 70%)

58% (53, 64%)

71% (66, 75%)

<0.001*

 Tax will result in job loss

23% (20, 26%)

26% (21, 31%)

21% (17, 26%)

 

 Don’t know

11% (8.7, 13%)

16% (12, 21%)

7.9% (5.6, 11%)

 

Family Financesc

 Tax will not negatively affect family finances

79% (75, 82%)

68% (62, 73%)

85% (81, 88%)

<0.001*

 Tax will negatively affect family finances

18% (15, 21%)

25% (21, 30%)

14% (10, 18%)

 

 Don’t know

3.6% (2.3, 5.4%)

6.9% (4.4, 11%)

1.6% (0.63, 3.9%)

 

Impact on People with Low-income and People of Colorc

 Tax will positively impact people with low-income/people of color

48% (44, 52%)

44% (38, 49%)

50% (45, 56%)

0.18

 Tax will negatively impact people with low-income/people of color

41% (37, 45%)

43% (38, 49%)

40% (35, 45%)

 

 Don’t know

11% (8.7, 13%)

13% (9.4, 17%)

10% (7.2, 13%)

 

Individual Choicec

 People will have the choice to drink the beverages they want

71% (67, 74%)

64% (59, 70%)

75% (70, 79%)

0.014

 People will not have the choice to drink the beverages they want

26% (23, 30%)

32% (27, 37%)

23% (19, 28%)

 

 Don’t know

3.0% (1.9, 4.5%)

3.9% (2.1, 7.2%)

2.4% (1.4, 4.2%)

 
  1. CI confidence interval, FPL Federal poverty line
  2. aValues are rounded to two significant digits. Missing data: opinion on tax (n = 1); cross-border shopping (n = 4), small business (n = 1); job loss (n = 1); impact on low-income people/people of color (n = 4); individual choice (n = 1)
  3. bResponses included: strongly disapprove, somewhat disapprove, somewhat approve, strongly approve, don’t know. These categories are collapsed into: approve, disapprove, don’t know
  4. cParticipants were read two statements and asked to indicate if the first statement was much closer, the first statement was somewhat closer, the second statement was much closer, or the second statement was somewhat closer. There was also an option to report “don’t know” or “refused” for each of the questions. These categories are collapsed into: the first statement was closer, the second statement was closer or don’t know
  5. *Denotes statistically significant difference in participants’ response to all three response categories (agree, disagree, don’t know), comparing lower-income to higher-income participants after considering multiple comparisons, using the Holm-Bonferroni Sequential Correction (p < 0.01). Statistical significance estimated using a Chi-squared test