Skip to main content

Table 3 Hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval for risk of type 2 diabetes according to waist circumference trajectory group by gender (N = 4, 992)

From: Waist circumference trajectories and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korean population: the Korean genome and epidemiology study (KoGES)

 

Men (N = 2342)

Women (N = 2650)

Model1a

Model2b

Model3c

Model1a

Model2b

Model3c

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

WC Group A

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

WC Group B

1.4 (0.5–4.0)

1.3 (0.5–3.9)

1.2 (0.4–3.6)

3.5 (1.4–9.0)

3.5 (1.4–9.0)

3.2 (1.3–8.3)

WC Group C

1.9 (0.7–5.4)

1.9 (0.7–5.4)

1.7 (0.6–4.8)

3.6 (1.4–9.3)

3.7 (1.4–9.6)

3.1 (1.2–8.0)

WC Group D

4.5 (1.6–12.5)

4.4 (1.6–12.3)

3.7 (1.3–10.4)

8.3 (3.2–21.3)

8.6 (3.4–22.2)

6.5 (2.5–16.9)

WC Group E

9.9 (3.3–29.3)

10.0 (3.4–29.5)

7.8 (2.6–23.5)

8.5 (3.1–23.3)

8.8 (3.2–24.4)

6.4 (2.3–18.1)

P for trend

<.0001

<.0001

<.0001

<.0001

<.0001

<.0001

P for interaction

0.1262*

  1. Abbreviation: WC waist circumference, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval; * there was no interaction between WC trajectories and gender
  2. aModel 1: Adjusted for age, age square, and family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus at wave 4
  3. bModel 2: Adjusted for Model 2 + smoking status, alcohol intake, physical exercise, and body mass index at wave 4
  4. cModel 3: Adjusted for Model 3 + systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol at wave 4
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us