Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regressions on being malnourished with background variables

From: Risk factors for malnutrition among school-aged children: a cross-sectional study in rural Madagascar

Logistic regression model

Adjusted OR

95% CI

P-value

Logistic regression on being stunteda

 v5: Seller, trader or commercial business (dummy variable for ‘Major income sources’)

2.173

1.120–4.219

0.022*

 v43: Milk and milk products (dummy variable for ‘Food consumption during last 24 h’)

0.671

0.309–1.458

0.313

 v45: Sweets (dummy variable for ‘Food consumption during last 24 h’)

0.616

0.382–0.994

0.047*

 v47: Age [year]

1.392

1.164–1.664

< 0.001**

 v48: Total number of household members [person]

1.172

1.031–1.333

0.015*

Logistic regression on being underweightb

 v5: Seller, trader or commercial business (dummy variable for ‘Major income sources’)

2.654

1.339–5.261

0.005**

 v25: Plastic bag (dummy variable for ‘Rice storage’)

1.923

0.962–3.844

0.064

 v39: Meats (dummy variable for ‘Food consumption during last 24 h’)

0.711

0.410–1.233

0.224

 v43: Milk and milk products (dummy variable for ‘Food consumption during last 24 h’)

0.725

0.321–1.634

0.437

 v47: Age [year]

1.474

1.189–1.827

<  0.001**

 v48: Total number of household members [person]

1.189

1.043–1.356

0.010*

 v51: Household dietary diversity score (HDDS) [pt]

0.832

0.701–0.993

0.043*

Logistic regression on being thinc

 v30: In open-space without cleaning (dummy variable for ‘Utensil maintenance’)

0.298

0.069–1.284

0.104

 v47: Age [year]

1.348

1.092–1.663

0.005**

 v48: Total number of household members [person]

1.240

1.038–1.481

0.018*

  1. *P < 0.05
  2. **P < 0.01
  3. aThe dichotomous independent variable (i.e. stunted or not stunted)
  4. bThe dichotomous independent variable (i.e. underweight or not underweight)
  5. cThe dichotomous independent variable (i.e. thin or not thin)