Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of two statistical indicators in communicating epidemiological results to the population: a randomized study in a high environmental risk area of Italy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Jun 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jon Fryzek
18 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
22 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Michela Baccini
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
10 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Research Square
6 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michela Baccini
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Research Square
25 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michela Baccini
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Research Square
3 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michela Baccini
Resubmission - Version 5
3 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michela Baccini
Resubmission - Version 6
15 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
17 May 2019 Editorially accepted
11 Jun 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12889-019-7003-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement