Skip to main content

Table 5 Changes between baseline and follow-up in occupational, sociodemographica- and life-style factors and self-efficacy in the total study sample (for each individual calculated as follow-up – baseline); mean values and standard deviation (SD). Single- and multi-exposure models between the changes in the potential risk factors and burnout at follow-up (levels 0–3), estimated with Ordinal Regression, with p-values, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In the last step, the multi-factor model was adjusted for burnout (level 0–3) at baseline, thereby estimating change versus change associations

From: Burnout among school teachers: quantitative and qualitative results from a follow-up study in southern Sweden

    

Burnout at follow-up (levels 0–3)

 

Scale

N

Follow-up - baseline

Single-exposure models

Multi-exposure model

Multi-exposure model, adjusted

Factors at baseline

  

Mean (SD)

p

OR (CI 95%)

p

OR (CI 95%)

p

OR (CI 95%)

Complaints on computer

  workstation arrangements; mean (SD)

1–5

306

0.0 (1.2)b

0.40

1.08 (0.90–1.31

 

-d

 

-d

 Job demands; mean (SD)

1–4

308

0.0 (0.4)b

< 0.01

2.15 (1.21–3.81)

0.02

2.09 (1.12–3.92)

< 0.001

3.41 (1.73–6.69)

 Job control – decision latitude; mean (SD)

1–4

310

0.0 (0.5)c

< 0.01

0.53 (0.34–0.83)

0.01

0.48 (0.29–0.81)

0.01

0.51 (0.30–0.87)

Job control - Skill discretion; mean (SD)

1–4

310

0.0 (0.3)c

0.06

0.49 (0.23–1.03)

0.17

0.56 (0.24–1.28)

0.10

0.49 (0.21–1.15)

Job support from manager; mean (SD)

1–4

310

0.0 (0.5)c

0.20

0.77 (0.52–1.15)

0.54

1.15 (0.73–1.81)

0.85

1.04 (0.66–1.66)

Job support from collegues; mean (SD)

1–4

308

0.0 (0.4)c

0.26

0.74 (0.44–1.25)

0.34

0.75 (0.42–1.35)

0.22

0.69 (0.38–1.26)

Emotional demands; mean (SD) d

0–4

310

−0.1 (0.6)b

0.04

1.42 (1.01–2.0)

 

- e

 

- e

 Demands of hiding emotions; mean (SD) d

0–4

310

0.0 (0.8)b

0.07

1.29 (0.98–1.71)

 

- e

 

- e

 Leadership; mean (SD) d

0–4

310

0.0 (0.8)c

0.48

0.91 (0.69–1.19)

 

- e

 

- e

 Self- efficacy; mean (SD)

1–5

309

0.0 (0.5)c

0.06

0.62 (0.38–1.01)

0.26

0.73 (0.42–1.26)

0.05

0.57 (0.32–1.01)

 Personal relaxation time; mean (SD)

1–6

304

0.0 (1.2)c

0.86

0.98 (0.83–1.17)

 

- d

 

-d

 Household work; mean (SD)

1–5

306

−0.1 (0.9)b

0.06

1.27 (0.99–1.63)

0.23

1.18 (0.90–1.53)

0.11

1.25 (0.95–1.65)

 Physical exercise; mean (SD)

0–4

307

0.0 (1.1)c

0.40

1.08 (0.90–1.31)

 

- d

 

-d

Burnout at baseline

overall

310

     

< 0.001

 
 

Level 0

165

      

1

 

Level 1

102

      

2.65 (1.55–4.53)

 

Level 2

30

      

8.79 (3.73–20.7)

 

Level 3

13

      

23.0 (6.53–80.7)

  1. aAge, seniority, changes in year of compulsory school (only 7 participants) and changes in marital status (11 participants) were not included in the analysis
  2. bPositive values means worse conditions at follow up
  3. cPositive values means better conditions at follow-up
  4. dNot included in the multi-exposure model, due to a p-value ≥0.3 in the single-factor models
  5. eNot included in the multi-exposure model, due to a high collinearity with the dimensions job demands and/or job support