Skip to main content

Table 1 Individual and partnership-level characteristics of MSMO and MSMW in Lima (N = 332; 1073 partnerships)

From: Homophobia and heteronormativity as dimensions of stigma that influence sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM) and women (MSMW) in Lima, Peru: a mixed-methods analysis

 

Any female partner in last 3 partnerships (N = 46)

No female partners in last 3 partnerships (N = 286)

Overall (N = 332)

p-value

Age (mean, SD)

31.8 (10.9)

30.6 (8.8)

30.7 (9.1)

0.793

Education (University or above vs. secondary or less)a

14 (30.4)

142 (49.8)

156 (47.1)

0.029

Sexual identity

 Heterosexual

19 (43.2)

4 (1.4)

23 (7.1)

< 0.001

 Bisexual

20 (45.4)

40 (14.3)

60 (18.5)

0.001

 Homosexual

5 (11.4)

236 (84.3)

241 (74.4)

 

HIV/STI status

 STI only

35 (76.1)

139 (48.6)

174 (52.4)

 

 HIV

11 (23.9)

147 (51.4)

158 (47.6)

 

Number of partners in last 3 months (mean, SD)

3.5 (4.5)

4.6 (9.7)

4.4 (8.9)

0.474

Partnership-Specific Characteristics

 

Female Partner (N = 86)

Male Partner (N = 987)

Overall (N = 1073)

p-value

Likely to disclose to partner

 No

38 (45.2)

331 (41.7)

369 (42.0)

0.62

 Yes

41 (48.8)

390 (49.1)

431 (49.1)

 

 I don’t know

5 (5.6)

73 (9.2)

78 (8.9)

 

Any unprotected insertive sex with partner in the last 3 months

67 (77.9)

348 (43.1)

415 (46.5)

< 0.001

Any oral sex with partner in the last 3 months

72 (83.7)

681 (84.4)

753 (84.3)

0.88

Partner is the primary partner

33 (38.4)

248 (30.7)

281 (31.5)

0.18

  1. Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate p-values for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables
  2. an (%), unless otherwise noted