Skip to main content

Table 2 Difference analysis of drinking status

From: Analysis of the alcohol drinking behavior and influencing factors among emerging adults and young adults: a cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China

Variables

Non- drinkers

Light drinkers

Moderate drinkers

Heavy drinkers

χ 2

p

n

% (95% CI)

n

% (95% CI)

n

% (95% CI)

n

% (95% CI)

Marital status

7.22

0.0072

 Married

424

58.6 (54.9–62.1)

279

38.5 (35.1–42.1)

13

1.8 (1.1–3.0)

8

1.1 (0.6–2.2)

  

 Not married

461

50.7 (47.4–53.9)

423

46.5 (43.3–49.7)

15

1.6 (1.0–2.7)

11

1.2 (0.7–2.2)

  

Current student status

4.24

0.0395

 Yes

161

48.6 (43.3–54.0)

162

48.9 (43.6–54.3)

1

0.3 (0.1–1.7)

7

2.1 (1.0–4.3)

  

 No

724

55.6 (52.9–58.2)

540

41.4 (38.8–44.1)

27

2.1 (1.4–3.0)

12

0.9 (0.5–1.6)

  

Emerging adulthood

7.36

0.0067

 Low

219

58.4 (53.4–63.3)

148

39.5 (34.7–44.5)

6

1.6 (0.7–3.4)

2

0.5 (0.1–1.9)

  

 Medium

218

49.1 (44.5–53.7)

210

47.3 (42.7–51.9)

11

2.5 (1.4–4.4)

5

1.1 (0.5–2.6)

  

 High

343

48.9 (45.2–52.6)

340

48.4 (44.8–52.1)

7

1.0 (0.5–2.0)

12

1.7 (1.0–3.0)

  
  1. Legend: 95% CI was calculated by Newcombe-wilson method