Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with high expected or high ideal drunkenness

From: Ideal, expected and perceived descriptive norm drunkenness in UK nightlife environments: a cross-sectional study

  

High expected drunkenness (above median, ≥8)

High ideal drunkenness (above median, ≥8)

95% CIs

95% CIs

AOR

Lower

Upper

P

AOR

Lower

Upper

P

Ideal drunkenness

 

1.42

1.14

1.76

0.002

Perceived norm drunkenness

1.28

1.04

1.59

0.023

1.00

0.83

1.21

0.976

Survey time (hour)

0.44

0.35

0.55

< 0.001

0.72

0.59

0.88

< 0.001

Drunkenness at survey

1.88

1.54

2.28

< 0.001

1.55

1.31

1.82

0.001

Alcohol units by survey

1.01

0.98

1.05

0.453

1.01

0.98

1.04

0.440

Expected home time (hour)

2.07

1.66

2.57

< 0.001

1.17

0.99

1.39

0.068

Gender (ref: Male)

Female

1.17

0.62

2.20

0.628

0.71

0.39

1.27

0.246

City (ref: City 1)

City 2

0.68

0.34

1.36

0.276

1.48

0.78

2.82

0.235

City 3

1.07

0.53

2.17

0.857

1.51

0.76

2.97

0.236

Preloaded (ref: no)

Yes

0.70

0.38

1.29

0.254

1.10

0.60

2.03

0.758

Age group (ref: [18,19,20])

21–24

1.44

0.74

2.81

0.287

0.90

0.48

1.68

0.731

25–35

0.78

0.38

1.62

0.505

0.56

0.28

1.12

0.103

  1. n = 394; 14 cases were excluded due to missing data on alcohol consumption, survey or expected home time; ref. = reference category; 95% CIs = 95% Confidence Intervals; AOR adjusted odds ratio