Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with high expected or high ideal drunkenness

From: Ideal, expected and perceived descriptive norm drunkenness in UK nightlife environments: a cross-sectional study

   High expected drunkenness (above median, ≥8) High ideal drunkenness (above median, ≥8)
95% CIs 95% CIs
AOR Lower Upper P AOR Lower Upper P
Ideal drunkenness   1.42 1.14 1.76 0.002
Perceived norm drunkenness 1.28 1.04 1.59 0.023 1.00 0.83 1.21 0.976
Survey time (hour) 0.44 0.35 0.55 < 0.001 0.72 0.59 0.88 < 0.001
Drunkenness at survey 1.88 1.54 2.28 < 0.001 1.55 1.31 1.82 0.001
Alcohol units by survey 1.01 0.98 1.05 0.453 1.01 0.98 1.04 0.440
Expected home time (hour) 2.07 1.66 2.57 < 0.001 1.17 0.99 1.39 0.068
Gender (ref: Male) Female 1.17 0.62 2.20 0.628 0.71 0.39 1.27 0.246
City (ref: City 1) City 2 0.68 0.34 1.36 0.276 1.48 0.78 2.82 0.235
City 3 1.07 0.53 2.17 0.857 1.51 0.76 2.97 0.236
Preloaded (ref: no) Yes 0.70 0.38 1.29 0.254 1.10 0.60 2.03 0.758
Age group (ref: [18,19,20]) 21–24 1.44 0.74 2.81 0.287 0.90 0.48 1.68 0.731
25–35 0.78 0.38 1.62 0.505 0.56 0.28 1.12 0.103
  1. n = 394; 14 cases were excluded due to missing data on alcohol consumption, survey or expected home time; ref. = reference category; 95% CIs = 95% Confidence Intervals; AOR adjusted odds ratio