Skip to main content

Table 5 Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for bariatric surgery by the individual characteristics

From: Socioeconomic factors, body mass index and bariatric surgery: a Swedish nationwide cohort study

 

Univariate, model 1

Adjusted for BMI, model 2

Multivariate, model 3

 

Hazard ratio, 95% CI

P value

Hazard ratio, 95% CI

P Value

Hazard ratio, 95% CI

P value

Women

Family income

• Low

1.9 (1.8–2.0)

0.001

1.6 (1.5–1.7)

0.001

1.4 (1.3–1.5)

0.001

• Middle

1.7 (1.6–1.8)

0.001

1.5 (1.4–1.6)

0.001

1.4 (1.3–1.5)

0.001

• High

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Education

• Low

2.2 (2.0–2.3)

0.001

1.8 (1.6–1.9)

0.001

1.7 (1.5–1.8)

0.001

• Middle

2.1 (2.0–2.2)

0.001

2.1 (2.0–2.2)

0.001

2.1 (2.0–2.1)

0.001

• High

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Employment

• Yes

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

• No

1.4 (1.3–1.5)

0.001

1.1 (1.0–1.2)

0.001

0.9 (0.9–0.9)

0.010

Marital Status

• Married

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

• Single

1.1 (1.0–1.1)

0.001

0.9 (0.9–0.9)

0.001

0.9 (0.9–0.90)

0.010

Men

Family income

• Low

1.3 (1.1–1.5)

0.001

0.9 (0.8–1.0)

0.050

0.8 (0.7–0.9)

0.020

• Middle

1.4 (1.3–1.6)

0.001

1.1 (1.0–1.2)

0.110

1.0 (0.9–1.2)

0.740

• High

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Education

• Low

3.5 (3.1–4.0)

0.001

2.2 (1.9–2.5)

0.001

2.1 (1.9–2.4)

0.001

• Middle

3.1 (2.8–3.4)

0.001

2.8 (2.5–3.1)

0.001

2.6 (2.4–2.9)

0.001

• High

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Employment

• Yes

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

• No

1.1 (1.0–1.2)

0.020

0.8 (0.8–0.9)

0.001

1.0 (0.9–1.1)

0.320

Marital Status

• Married

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

• Single

0.8 (0.7–0.9)

0.001

0.5 (0.5–0.6)

0.001

0.6 (0.5–0.7)

0.001

  1. Cox regression analysis with univariate, adjusted for BMI, and multivariate models (the highest hazard ratios are in bold and underlined)