Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand

BMC Public Health

Table 2 Estimates of the Impact of Warning Labels on Measures of Diet Quality in the Pilot-DIET Study (N = 512)

Dependent Variable	Proportion of High-in Sugar Products (%)	Total Sugar Purchased (g)	Sugar purchased per dollar spent (g / $)	Total Dollar Spent ($)	Total expenditure on high-in-sugar products ($)
Dependent Variable	Coefficient [Std. Error]	Coefficient [Std. Error]	Coefficient [Std. Error]	Coefficient [Std. Error]	Coefficient [Std. Error]
Constant	0.08	351.82	7.90	60.76	−4.92
Constant	[0.04]	[179.93]	[1.77]	[13.44]	[4.82]
Stop Sign Label	−0.02	48.91	0.51	2.35	0.61
Stop Sign Label	[0.02]	[65.44]	[0.645]	[4.89]	[1.75]
Warning Label	−0.04 ***	26.18	0.36	2.01	−1.61
Warning Label	[0.02]	[64.55]	[0.64]	[4.82]	[1.73]
Age (years)	0.00	10.50 ***	0.03	0.79 ***	0.27 ***
Age (years)	[0.00]	[2.60]	[0.03]	[0.19]	[0.07]
BMI (kg/m²)	0.01 ***	10.20 *	0.10 *	−0.15	0.58 ***
BMI (kg/m²)	[0.00]	[5.82]	[0.06]	[0.44]	[0.16]
Female	0.02	−88.05	−1.50 ***	−2.39	2.22
Female	[0.01]	[56.00]	[0.55]	[4.18]	[1.50]
Chinese	−0.03 *	− 196.51 **	− 2.45 ***	− 0.60	−3.12
Chinese	[0.02]	[77.35]	[0.76]	[5.78]	[2.07]
Primary grocery Purchaser	−0.01	−47.61	0.35	−3.24	−0.68
Primary grocery Purchaser	[0.02]	[62.21]	[0.61]	[4.65]	[1.67]
Has Children	0.01	−7.07	−0.12	1.29	−1.36
Has Children	[0.02]	[60.95]	[0.60]	[4.55]	[1.63]

ISSN: 1471-2458