Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant characteristics

From: Service-users’ perspectives of link worker social prescribing: a qualitative follow-up study

ID

Sex

Age-band

Employment status

No. of WtW LTCsa

No. of non-WtW conditionsb

Mental health /social isolationc

Months since commenced WTW involvement

Current involvement with link worker

1

Male

70–74

Retired

3

3

Yes

N/a

N/a

2

Female

70–74

Retired

3

3

Yes

17

Health problem preventing involvement

3

Female

45–49

Employed

1

1

Yes

14

Involvement decreasing in intensity as situation improves

4

Female

55–59

Unemployed

2

1

Yes

14

LW changed twice. No contact from new LW

5

Female

65–69

Retired

2

4

Yes

15

Involvement decreasing in intensity as situation improves

6

Male

65–69

Retired

2

1

Yes

16

Same level of link worker contact

7

Male

55–59

Unemployed

2

1

No

21

No contact from new LW

8

Female

55–59

Unemployed

2

3

No

16

Involvement decreasing in intensity as situation improves

9

Male

55–59

Employed

3

3

Yes

N/a

N/a

10

Male

65–69

Unemployed

2

4

Yes

17

Health preventing involvement

11

Male

45–49

Unemployed

2

4

Yes

14

No contact from LW

12

Male

55–59

Unemployed

1

3

Yes

12

Involvement decreasing in intensity as situation improves

13

Male

60–64

Unemployed

1

2

Yes

12

No contact from new LW

14

Male

60–64

Unemployed

2

1

No

N/a

N/a

15

Female

40–44

Unemployed

1

0

No

19

Involvement decreased after link worker change

16

Female

65–69

Retired

2

0

No

18

Same level of link worker contact

17

Female

50–54

Unemployed

2

0

Yes

15

Involvement decreasing in intensity as situation improves

18

Female

65–69

Retired

3

2

Yes

16

Involvement decreasing in intensity as situation improves

19

Male

65–69

Retired

2

4

Yes

16

Less involvement due to health problem

20

Male

70–74

Retired

2

1

No

17

No contact for a few months as felt he had gained maximum benefit

21

Female

70–74

Retired

3

1

No

18

Same level of contact with LW

22

Female

40–44

Unemployed

2

2

Yes

N/a

N/a

23

Male

70–74

Retired

2

4

No

22

Less contact due to health problem

24

Female

70–74

Retired

2

0

Yes

N/a

N/a

25

Female

50–54

Unemployed

3

1

Yes

18

Same level of contact

26

Male

70–74

Retired

2

3

No

N/a

N/a

27

Male

40–44

Employed

1

1

Yes

24

No contact from new LW

28

Male

70–74

Retired

2

1

No

24

Less involvement due to a health problem

29

Male

60–64

Employed

1

3

Yes

NKd

Less involvement due to change of LW

30

Male

45–49

Unemployed

2

3

Yes

NKd

Same level of contact

  1. Italicised text represents participants lost to follow-up
  2. aMedical-practitioner diagnosed ‘Ways to Wellness’ referral conditions
  3. bSelf-reported at interview
  4. cBroad category that includes low mood, anxiety, depression, loneliness and social isolation and based on self-report at interview where participants described or reported these conditions or feelings
  5. dNot known