Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression model results for HIV testing and clinic contact comparing the intervention to the enhanced SOC groups

From: Announcing the availability of oral HIV self-test kits via text message to increase HIV testing among hard-to-reach truckers in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial

Β 

Total, n (%)

Enhanced SOC group, n (%)

Intervention group, n (%)

OR (95% CI)

Chi-Square p-value

Total

1498 (100.0%)

748 (49.9%)

750 (50.1%)

NA

NA

Tested for HIV (according to EHRS only)

 Yes

36 (2.4%)

10 (1.3%)

26 (3.5%)

2.7 (1.3–5.5)

0.009

 No

1462 (97.6%)

738 (98.7%)

724 (96.5%)

Β Β 

Tested for HIV (including those with an HIV test indication only in the clinic administrative records)a

 Yes

41 (2.7%)

10 (1.3%)

31 (4.1%)

3.2 (1.6–6.5)

0.002

 No

1457 (97.3%)

738 (98.7%)

719 (95.9%)

Β Β 

Received any clinic services (according to EHRS only)

 Yes

169 (11.3%)

80 (10.7%)

89 (11.9%)

1.1 (0.8–1.6)

0.474

 No

1329 (88.7%)

668 (89.3%)

661 (88.1%)

Β Β 

Received any clinic services (including those with an HIV test indication only in the clinic administrative records)a

 Yes

174 (11.6%)

80 (10.7%)

94 (12.5%)

1.2 (0.9–1.6)

0.267

 No

1324 (88.4%)

668 (89.3%)

656 (87.5%)

Β Β 
  1. a5 clients were noted as having HIV tested in the clinic administrative records used for tracking self-test kits and posttest counseling but their test was not indicated in the EHRS. Here these 5 are recoded (data cleaned based on additional information) as having HIV-tested and the analysis rerun