Skip to main content

Table 1 Calibration of Conditions and Outcome for Successa

From: Pathways leading to success and non-success: a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity health promotion program applying fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

Feature

Explanation

Method of data collection (computation, number of items~)

Full Membership

Crossover Point

Full Non-membership

O: SCE

Emotional and social school experience

pupils self-report via questionnaire

0.25

0.16

0.09

C: PAB

Physical activity breaks in minutes/school week (dosage)

teacher self-report via questionnaire (2 items)

60

40

15.1

C: QOI

Quality of implementation

trainer rating via observation (mean, 2 time points)

2.99

2.56

1.49

C: PSE

Perceived self-efficacy of implementing the intervention

teacher self-report via questionnaire (weighted mean, 2 items)

10

7.9

6.1

C: BOI

Expected benefits of the intervention for pupils

teacher self-report via questionnaire (mean, 8 items)

3.84

3.6

3.4

C: KAI

Knowledge about the intervention (topic covered during education and further training, self-organized learning)

teacher self-report via questionnaire (mean, 3 items)

3.65

2.8

2.34

  1. Abbreviations: BOI benefits of intervention, C Condition, O Outcome, KAI knowledge about the intervention, PAB physical activity breaks (dosage), PSE perceived self-efficacy, SCE, school-experience, QOI quality of implementation
  2. aThe same anchors were used for analyzing pathways of non-success. The full non-membership anchors for defining success relate to the full membership anchors for defining non-success and vice versa
  3. ~ The possible range, different values can take, is listed in Table 2
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us