Skip to main content

Table 7 Logistic regression analysis for factor associated with Good knowledge regarding Congo fever

From: Knowledge, perception and attitude about Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) among medical and pharmacy students of Pakistan

Variables

Knowledge

Odds ratio

P-Value

Good knowledge

Poor knowledge

(95% CI)

Gender

 Female

277 (45.26%)

335 (54.74%)

1.45(1.046–2.01)

0.026

 Male

109 (37.97%)

179 (62.03%)

Reference

Profession

 Physician

254 (58.26%)

182 (41.74%)

1.413(0.974–2.049)

0.068

 Pharmacist

132 (28.44%)

332 (71.55%)

Reference

Age

 18–21

87 (29.79%)

205 (70.21%)

0.337(0.217–0.523)

< 0.001

 22–25

129 (35.90%)

230 (64.07%)

0.482(0.324–0.716)

< 0.001

 26 <

170 (68.27%)

79 (31.73%)

Reference

Marital status

 Married

236 (64.13%)

132 (35.87%)

2.703(1.831–3.989)

< 0.001

 Single

150 (28.20%)

382 (71.80%)

Reference

College

 Public Sector

220 (51.04%)

211 (48.96%)

2.083(1.513–2.868)

< 0.001

 Private Sector

166 (35.39%)

303 (64.61%)

Reference

Study Year

 Ph.D

04 (33.30%)

08 (66.67%)

0.320(0.084–1.220)

0.095

 M.Phil

54 (64.29%)

30 (35.71%)

1.389(0.808–2.389)

0.235

5th year

153 (38.25%)

247 (61.75%)

0.546(0.392–0.762)

< 0.001

4th year

175(43.32%)

229(56.68%)

Reference

 
  1. Knowledge section was assessed by giving a score of 1 to correct answer and 0 to wrong answer. A score of greater than equal to 14 was regarded as good and a score of less than 14 was regarded as poor
  2. OR = Odds Ratio
  3. P < 0.05 (2-tailed) considered significant