Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Information bias of social gradients in sickness absence: a comparison of self-report data in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and data in national registries

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bjørn E. Holstein
11 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jurgita Narusyte
4 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Petter Kristensen
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Petter Kristensen
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Petter Kristensen
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Nov 2018 Editorially accepted
20 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12889-018-6208-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement