Open Peer Review Reports for: Knowledge on voluntary medical male circumcision in a low uptake setting in northern Uganda
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 Sep 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - BARBARA NANTEZA |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Sep 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Oct 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - BARBARA NANTEZA |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Oct 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - BARBARA NANTEZA |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Oct 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Nov 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12889-018-6158-2 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
