Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of PM2.5and quit rate

From: Cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to second-hand smoke in the home

 

Base-case analysis (with imputed data)

Complete case analysis

 

Intervention

Usual Care

Difference (95% CI)

P-value

Intervention

Usual care

Difference (95% CI)

P-value

No. of households

n = 102

n = 102

n = 204

 

n = 90

n = 82

n = 172

 

Cost (SD)

£328 (£151)

£45 (£20)

£283 (£254 to £313)

< 0.001

£331 (£149)

£46 (£21)

£285 (£252 to £318)

< 0.001

Reduction in PM2.5 (ug/m3) (SD)

22.1 (65.2)

0.5 (52.0)

21.6 (5.4 to 37.9)

0.0096

24.0 (58.9)

0.9 (52.4)

23.2(6.3 to 40.0)

0.007

Reduction in PM2.5 (10μg/m3) (SD)

2.21 (6.52)

0.05 (5.20)

2.16 (0.54 to 3.79)

0.0096

2.40 (5.89)

0.09 (5.24)

2.32 (0.63 to 4.0)

0.007

ICER (bootstrapped 95% CI)

£131 (£72 to £467)

£121 (£70 to £471)

No. of households

n = 102

n = 102

n = 204

 

n = 95

n = 93

n = 188

 

Cost (SD)

£328 (£151)

£45 (£20)

£283 (£254 to £313)

< 0.001

£331 (£148)

£44 (£21)

£286 (£256 to £317)

< 0.001

Quit rate (%)(SD)

8.0% (27.0%)

4.3% (19.6%)

3.7% (−2.8% to 10.2%)

0.2614

8.4% (27.9%)

4.3% (20.4%)

4.1% (−2.9% to 11.2%)

0.248

ICER (bootstrapped 95% CI)

£71 (−£57 to £309)

£72 (−£22 to £313)