Simple and rationale-providing SMS reminders to promote accelerometer use: a within-trial randomised trial comparing persuasive messages
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Feb 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kerem Shuval|
|2 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andre Muller|
|15 Aug 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Matti Heino|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Aug 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kerem Shuval|
|21 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andre Muller|
|7 Sep 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Matti Heino|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Sep 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Oct 2018||Editorially accepted|
|7 Dec 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12889-018-6121-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.