Table 2 Factors associated with consistent condom use among high-risk MSM with different sex partner types in China, 2015 (N = 1057)
Variables | Both typesa | Regulara | Casuala | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude model | Adjusted model | Crude model | Adjusted model b | Crude model | Adjusted modelb | |
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Student | ||||||
 Yes | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
 No | 1.04(0.71–1.51) | 1.06(0.66–1.71) | 0.93(0.63–1.38) | 0.82(0.5–1.34) | 1.23(0.83–1.84) | 1.14(0.7–1.87) |
Sexual orientation | ||||||
 Gay | 0.53(0.23–1.26) | 0.52(0.22–1.24) | 0.59(0.24–1.41) | 0.60(0.25–1.45) | 1.47(0.46–4.71) | 1.46(0.45–4.73) |
 Bisexual | 0.84(0.35–2.06) | 0.86(0.35–2.1) | 0.66(0.26–1.67) | 0.68(0.27–1.72) | 1.64(0.5–5.43) | 1.65(0.5–5.49) |
 Unsure/other | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Education | ||||||
 High school or below | 1.1(0.41–2.96) | 1.09(0.4–2.98) | 0.81(0.31–2.08) | 0.83(0.31–2.2) | 0.55(0.22–1.37) | 0.58(0.23–1.47) |
 Some college | 1.98(0.74–5.27) | 1.97(0.73–5.31) | 1.44(0.57–3.68) | 1.48(0.57–3.84) | 1.02(0.41–2.52) | 1.04(0.41–2.58) |
 College/Bachelors | 1.15(0.43–3.07) | 1.11(0.41–2.98) | 0.83(0.33–2.11) | 0.84(0.32–2.17) | 1.04(0.43–2.54) | 1.05(0.43–2.59) |
Masters or PhD | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
 Social norms | 1.61(0.98–2.64)* | 1.59(0.97-2.60)* | 1.59(1.20-2.09)* | 1.58(1.19-2.09)* | 1.49(1.14-1.95)* | 1.48(1.13-1.95)* |
 Self-efficacy | 2.92(1.62–5.25)* | 2.88(1.59-5.22)* | 2.36(1.70-3.26)* | 2.35(1.69-3.26)* | 2.50(1.85-3.37)* | 2.45(1.81-3.32)* |