An exploratory analysis of the interactions between social norms and the built environment on cycling for recreation and transport

Table 1 Independent variables descriptive statistics

Independent Variable	Mean (SD)
Perceived Neighbourhood Cycling Infrastructure^a	3.20 (0.73)
Perceived Maintenance of Neighbourhood Cycling Infrastructure^a	3.08 (0.73)
Perceived Neighbourhood Pleasantness and Aesthetic^a	2.80 (0.67)
Perceived Cycling Network and connectivity^a	2.91 (0.56)
Perceived Workplace Built Environment^a	3.33 (0.47)
Home Suburb Walk Score^b	74.96 (13.90)
Work Suburb Walk Score^b	87.97 (8.30)
Descriptive Norm^c	3.65 (0.79)
Group Norm^d	8.12 (1.19)

^aComposite score of items measured on a 4-point Likert scale. Higher score indicates more positive perceptions
^bA composite ranking from 0 to 100 based on neighbourhood’s land-use mix, residential density and street connectivity. Higher score indicates more walkable neighbourhood
^cComposite score of items measured in 5-point Likert scale. Higher score indicates more positive norms
^dAddition of two composite scores of items measured on 5-point Likert scale. Higher score indicates more positive norms

ISSN: 1471-2458