Skip to main content

Table 4 Stepwise Logistic Regression Predicting for At-Risk Gambling compared to Recreational Gambling (n = 6,871)

From: The importance of friends and family to recreational gambling, at-risk gambling, and problem gambling

 

Odds Ratio & 95% C.I.

Wald Statistics

p

Casino Gambling

 No

Reference group

110.4

< .0001

 Yes

2.73 (2.26, 3.29)

Portion of friends and family regular gamblers

2.16 (1.86, 2.51)

101.0

< .0001

 Instant Lottery

  No

Reference group

48.3

< .0001

  Yes

2.04 (1.67, 2.50)

 Daily Lottery Games

  No

Reference group

41.6

< .0001

  Yes

1.97 (1.61, 2.43)

 Gender

  Male

1.60 (1.33, 1.94)

24.1

< .0001

  Female

Reference group

 Online Gambling

  No

Reference group

22.1

< .0001

  Yes

3.31 (2.01, 5.46)

 Born in United States

  No

1.79 (1.37, 2.32)

19.0

< .0001

  Yes

Reference group

 Private Betting

  No

Reference group

18.3

< .0001

  Yes

1.70 (1.34, 2.18)

 Education

  Beyond Bachelor’s degree

Reference group

Reference group

  High school or less

1.92 (1.40, 2.63)

16.7

< .0001

  Bachelor’s or some College

1.24 (0.95, 1.62)

2.4

< .0001

 Bingo

  No

Reference group

13.4

< .0001

  Yes

1.88 (1.34, 2.64)

 Raffles

  No

1.30 (1.08, 1.57)

7.3

< .0001

  Yes

Reference group

Household income

.97 (0.95, 0.99)

6.9

.0008

 Mental health problems past 12 months

  No

Reference group

6.7

.0002

  Yes

1.36 (1.07, 1.73)

 Alcohol use past 30 days

  No

1.32 (1.07, 1.63)

6.5

< .0001

  Yes

Reference group