Skip to main content

Table 1 Individual Study Characteristics

From: Understanding how outcomes are measured in workplace physical activity interventions: a scoping review

Author

Publication Date

Country

Work Setting

Sample Size

aQuality

Intervention

Individual Studies

 Davey, J., et al.

2009

New Zealand

University Employees

134

C

Physical activity-steps

 Dishman, R., et al.

2009

United States/Canada

Home Improvement Stores

1442

A

Physical activitysteps/**MVPA

 Maruyama, C., et al.

2010

Japan

Health Insurance Association

101

A

Nutrition/Physical Activitysteps

 McEachan, R., et al.

2011

UK

Bus Company; Hospital; Local Government; National Government; University

1274

A

Physical activity-MVPA

 Morgan, PJ, et al.

2012

Australia

Tomago Aluminum

110

B

Weight lossnutrition/pedometer

 Edries, N., et al.

2013

South Africa

3 Clothing Manufacturing Companies

90

A

Wellness program with ***CBT and exercise classes

 Chae, D., et al.

2015

South Korea

Airline Company

70

C

Physical activity-steps

 Brakenridge, C.L., et al.

2016

Australia

Lendlease-International Property and Infrastructure Group

153

A

Physical activity-reduced sitting time

 Hendricksen, I., et al.

2016

Netherlands

Dutch Insurance Company

433

C

Lifestyle-MVPA/sedentary behavior

 Hori, H., et al.

2016

Japan

Not listed

490

C

Physical activity-steps

 Aittasalo, M., et al.

2017

Finland

12 small-medium size workplaces

396

C

Physical Activity-reduce sitting time

 Arrogi, A., et al.

2017

Belgium

Pharmaceutical Company

300

B

Physical activity cousellingswim, bike, run, walk

  1. aGrading system is based on study design; A - RCT / B - Quazi-randomized trials / C - Observational Study / D - Other Evidence [28]
  2. **MVPA - Moderate to vigorous physical activity
  3. ***CBT - Cognitive behavior therapy