Skip to main content

Table 1 Individual Study Characteristics

From: Understanding how outcomes are measured in workplace physical activity interventions: a scoping review

Author Publication Date Country Work Setting Sample Size aQuality Intervention
Individual Studies
 Davey, J., et al. 2009 New Zealand University Employees 134 C Physical activity-steps
 Dishman, R., et al. 2009 United States/Canada Home Improvement Stores 1442 A Physical activitysteps/**MVPA
 Maruyama, C., et al. 2010 Japan Health Insurance Association 101 A Nutrition/Physical Activitysteps
 McEachan, R., et al. 2011 UK Bus Company; Hospital; Local Government; National Government; University 1274 A Physical activity-MVPA
 Morgan, PJ, et al. 2012 Australia Tomago Aluminum 110 B Weight lossnutrition/pedometer
 Edries, N., et al. 2013 South Africa 3 Clothing Manufacturing Companies 90 A Wellness program with ***CBT and exercise classes
 Chae, D., et al. 2015 South Korea Airline Company 70 C Physical activity-steps
 Brakenridge, C.L., et al. 2016 Australia Lendlease-International Property and Infrastructure Group 153 A Physical activity-reduced sitting time
 Hendricksen, I., et al. 2016 Netherlands Dutch Insurance Company 433 C Lifestyle-MVPA/sedentary behavior
 Hori, H., et al. 2016 Japan Not listed 490 C Physical activity-steps
 Aittasalo, M., et al. 2017 Finland 12 small-medium size workplaces 396 C Physical Activity-reduce sitting time
 Arrogi, A., et al. 2017 Belgium Pharmaceutical Company 300 B Physical activity cousellingswim, bike, run, walk
  1. aGrading system is based on study design; A - RCT / B - Quazi-randomized trials / C - Observational Study / D - Other Evidence [28]
  2. **MVPA - Moderate to vigorous physical activity
  3. ***CBT - Cognitive behavior therapy