Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What’s the difference? A gender perspective on understanding educational inequalities in all-cause and cause-specific mortality

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian John Distelberg
2 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa A. Clark
9 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Karen van Hedel
Resubmission - Version 2
9 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Karen van Hedel
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Karen van Hedel
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Karen van Hedel
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
7 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
10 Sep 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12889-018-5940-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement