Skip to main content

Table 1 Model fit statistics for different questionnaires to assess motivation and confidence constructs

From: Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy

 

Chi-square

Df

P

CFI

RMSEA

RMSEA 90% CI

λ range

Adequacy and predilection (original)

291.99

103

< 0.001

0.744

0.095

0.082, 0.107

0.301–0.698

Adequacy and predilection (revised)

29.21

32

0.609

1.0

0.00

0.000, 0.046

0.531–0.836

Benefits and barriers (original)

230.06

151

< 0.001

0.894

0.051

0.037, 0.063

0.359–0.768

Benefits and barriers (revised)

189.20

150

0.017

0.948

0.036

0.016, 0.051

0.349–0.783

Perceived competence (original)

6.87

9

0.650

1.0

0.000

0.000, 0.064

0.115–0.765

Perceived competence (revised)

2.94

5

0.710

1.0

0.000

0.000, 0.072

0.475–0.767

Motivation

92.16

48

< 0.001

0.907

0.067

0.046, 0.087

0.427–0.859

  1. Note. Adequacy and predilection original = original CAPL model with 16 items. Adequacy and predilection (revised) = reduced model based on EFA results with 10 items and 3 subscales representing adequacy, predilection, and behaviour. Benefits and barriers (original) = original model with 19 items. Benefits and barriers (revised) = revised model with a correlated error. Perceived competence (original) = perceived competence with 6 items. Perceived competence (revised) = perceived competence excluding the reverse coded item. Motivation = intrinsic, identified, introjected, and extrinsic regulation subscales
  2. CFI comparative fit index, CI 90% confidence interval, Df degrees of freedom, EFA exploratory factor analysis, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, λ standardized factor loading