Table 2 Comparison of Incidence Estimates by IPM Approach with other Cohort Studies

1.

Malaysia

Present study

2009

All

7.13

n/a

0.29

Malaysia

2009

0–15

10.7

n/a

0.22

Malaysia

2013

All

6.99

n/a

0.36

Malaysia

2013

0–15

11.0

n/a

0.3

2.

Rayong, Thailand

Sangakawibha [56]

1980–1981

4–14

9.4

n/a

0.1

3.

Bangkok, Thailand

Burke [51]

1980–1981

4–16

11.8

0.7

0.4

4.

Yangon, Myamar

Thein [57]

1984–1988

1–9

5.1

n/a

0.3

5.

Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Graham [58]

1996–1996

4–9

29.2

0.6

0.4

6.

Kamphaeng Phet Thailand

Endy [45, 59]

1998–2002

7–11

7.3

3.9

1.0

7.

Iquitos Peru

Morrison [60]

1999–2005

5–20

34.5

n/a

n/a

8.

W Java Indonesia

Porter [33]

2000–2002

18–66

7.4

1.8

0.1

9.

Managua, Nicaragua

Balmaseda [61]

2001–2002

4–16

9.0

0.85

n/a

10.

Maracay Venezuela

Comach [62]

2001–2002

5–13

16.9

n/a

n/a

11.

Kamphaeng Phet Thailand

Mammen [63]

2004–2006

4–13

6.7

2.2

0.5

12.

Ratchaburi Thailand

Sirivichayakul [64], Sabchareon [34]

2006–2009

3–11

3.6

3.6

1.6

13.

Managua, Nicaragua

Balmaseda [48]

2004–2010

2–9

9.0

0.85

n/a

14.

Long Xuyen Vietnam

Tien [36]

2004–2007

2–15

3.0

3.0

1.2

15.