Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of Incidence Estimates by IPM Approach with other Cohort Studies

From: Estimating dengue incidence and hospitalization in Malaysia, 2001 to 2013

# Area, Country Author [Ref] Year Age in years Incidence of dengue (%) Incidence of symptomatic dengue (%) Incidence of hospitalized dengue (%)
1. Malaysia Present study 2009 All 7.13 n/a 0.29
Malaysia   2009 0–15 10.7 n/a 0.22
Malaysia   2013 All 6.99 n/a 0.36
Malaysia   2013 0–15 11.0 n/a 0.3
2. Rayong, Thailand Sangakawibha [56] 1980–1981 4–14 9.4 n/a 0.1
3. Bangkok, Thailand Burke [51] 1980–1981 4–16 11.8 0.7 0.4
4. Yangon, Myamar Thein [57] 1984–1988 1–9 5.1 n/a 0.3
5. Yogyakarta, Indonesia Graham [58] 1996–1996 4–9 29.2 0.6 0.4
6. Kamphaeng Phet Thailand Endy [45, 59] 1998–2002 7–11 7.3 3.9 1.0
7. Iquitos Peru Morrison [60] 1999–2005 5–20 34.5 n/a n/a
8. W Java Indonesia Porter [33] 2000–2002 18–66 7.4 1.8 0.1
9. Managua, Nicaragua Balmaseda [61] 2001–2002 4–16 9.0 0.85 n/a
10. Maracay Venezuela Comach [62] 2001–2002 5–13 16.9 n/a n/a
11. Kamphaeng Phet Thailand Mammen [63] 2004–2006 4–13 6.7 2.2 0.5
12. Ratchaburi Thailand Sirivichayakul [64], Sabchareon [34] 2006–2009 3–11 3.6 3.6 1.6
13. Managua, Nicaragua Balmaseda [48] 2004–2010 2–9 9.0 0.85 n/a
14. Long Xuyen Vietnam Tien [36] 2004–2007 2–15 3.0 3.0 1.2
15. Malaysia L’Azou [50], Nealon [32] 2010 2–16 (participants in control arm of vaccine trial) n/a Overall: 2.2
Age 2–4: 2.5
Age 5–8: 1.7
Age 9–12: 3.1
Age 13–16: 1.7
0.85