Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Adolescent perceptions of dissuasive sticks: a web survey among 16–20 year olds in Norway

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ingeborg Lund
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ingeborg Lund
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neal Doran
27 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Hoek
17 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Crawford Moodie
22 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ingeborg Lund
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neal Doran
10 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ingeborg Lund
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12889-018-5847-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement