Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean health literacy scores (±SD) and effect sizes (95%CI) across anthropometric and lifestyle risk factors

From: Health literacy in a population-based sample of Australian women: a cross-sectional profile of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study

 

Scale 1.

Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers

Scale 2.

Having sufficient information to manage my health

Scale 3.

Actively managing my health

Scale 4.

Social support for health

Scale 5.

Appraisal of health information

Scale 6.

Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers

Scale 7.

Navigating the healthcare system

Scale 8.

Ability to find good health information

Scale 9.

Understanding health information well enough to know what to do

Mean score (±SD)

Score range 1–4

Score range 1–5

BMI (kg/m2)

< 25

3.17 (0.53)

n = 220

3.11 (0.41)

n = 220

3.10 (0.50)

n = 219

3.15 (0.43)

n = 219

2.85 (0.48)

n = 219

4.19 (0.54)

n = 216

4.13 (0.54)

n = 216

4.16 (0.54)

n = 216

4.29 (0.52)

n = 216

≥25

3.23 (0.49)

n = 435

3.07 (0.43)

n = 435

2.93 (0.47)

n = 434

3.06 (0.51)

n = 435

2.79 (0.49)

n = 435

4.19 (0.56)

n = 432

4.10 (0.54)

n = 431

4.11 (0.57)

n = 431

4.29 (0.50)

n = 432

Effect size for BMI (95% CI)

− 0.12 (− 0.19, − 0.07)

0.09 (0.04, 0.14)

0.35 (0.29, 0.40)

0.19 (0.13, 0.23)

0.12 (0.06, 0.17)

0.00 (− 0.07, 0.05)

0.05 (− 0.02, 0.11)

0.09 (0.02, 0.14)

0.00 (− 0.07, 0.05)

 Waist circumference (cm)

< 80

3.19 (0.52)

n = 194

3.14 (0.42)

n = 194

3.11 (0.53)

n = 194

3.17 (0.45)

n = 194

2.85 (0.49)

n = 194

4.19 (0.59)

n = 191

4.14 (0.59)

n = 191

4.20 (0.59)

n = 191

4.33 (0.56)

n = 191

≥80

3.22 (0.50)

n = 463

3.06 (0.42)

n = 463

2.93 (0.46)

n = 461

3.06 (0.50)

n = 462

2.79 (0.48)

n = 462

4.18 (0.54)

n = 459

4.09 (0.53)

n = 458

4.08 (0.56)

n = 458

4.27 (0.50)

n = 459

Effect size for waist (95% CI)

−0.06 (− 0.13, − 0.01)

0.19 (0.13, 0.23)

0.37 (0.30, 0.42)

0.23 (0.16, 0.27)

0.12 (0.06, 0.17)

0.02 (− 0.07, 0.07)

0.09 (0.01, 0.14)

0.21 (0.13, 0.26)

0.12 (0.04, 0.16)

 Sedentary

No

3.20 (0.50)

n = 502

3.09 (0.40)

n = 502

3.03 (0.49)

n = 500

3.10 (0.49)

n = 501

2.81 (0.49)

n = 501

4.22 (0.54)

n = 495

4.14 (0.53)

n = 494

4.18 (0.52)

n = 494

4.34 (0.49)

n = 495

Yes

3.26 (0.52)

n = 162

3.03 (0.52)

n = 162

2.87 (0.46)

n = 162

3.06 (0.51)

n = 162

2.79 (0.49)

n = 162

4.08 (0.65)

n = 162

4.00 (0.68)

n = 162

3.92 (0.73)

n = 162

4.11 (0.65)

n = 162

Effect size for sedentary (95% CI)

−0.12 (−0.16, 0.04)

0.14 (0.10, 0.22)

0.33 (0.29, 0.40)

0.08 (0.04, 0.16)

0.04 (0.00, 0.12)

0.25 (0.20, 0.35)

0.25 (0.20, 0.35)

0.45 (0.40, 0.56)

0.43 (0.39, 0.53)

 Alcohol-drinks per day

≤2

3.20 (0.50)

n = 504

3.06 (0.43)

n = 504

2.97 (0.48)

n = 503

3.07 (0.50)

n = 503

2.80 (0.49)

n = 503

4.17 (0.57)

n = 498

4.08 (0.58)

n = 497

4.09 (0.60)

n = 497

4.25 (0.55)

n = 498

> 2

3.24 (0.54)

n = 162

3.14 (0.42)

n = 160

3.03 (0.53)

n = 159

3.15 (0.46)

n = 160

2.84 (0.48)

n = 160

4.23 (0.51)

n = 159

4.16 (0.50)

n = 159

4.20 (0.50)

n = 159

4.38 (0.47)

n = 159

Effect size for alcohol (95% CI)

−0.08 (−0.12, 0.00)

−0.19 (−0.22, − 0.12)

−0.12 (− 0.16, − 0.04)

−0.16 (− 0.21, − 0.09)

−0.08 (− 0.12, − 0.01)

−0.11 (− 0.16, − 0.03)

−0.14 (− 0.19, − 0.06)

−0.19 (− 0.24, − 0.11)

−0.24 (− 0.29, − 0.17)

 Smoking

No

3.22 (0.49)

n = 596

3.08 (0.43)

n = 596

3.00 (0.48)

n = 594

3.10 (0.48)

n = 595

2.81 (0.49)

n = 595

4.17 (0.56)

n = 590

4.09 (0.57)

n = 590

4.11 (0.58)

n = 589

4.27 (0.54)

n = 589

Yes

3.12 (0.65)

n = 69

3.10 (0.49)

n = 69

2.84 (0.56)

n = 69

2.99 (0.58)

n = 69

2.79 (0.51)

n = 69

4.23 (0.66)

n = 69

4.17 (0.59)

n = 69

4.17 (0.68)

n = 69

4.40 (0.52)

n = 69

Effect size for smoking (95% CI)

0.20 (0.16, 0.35)

−0.04 (−0.08, 0.12)

0.33 (0.29, 0.46)

0.22 (0.19, 0.36)

0.04 (0.00, 0.16)

−0.11 (− 0.15, 0.05)

−0.14 (− 0.19, 0.00)

−0.10 (− 0.15, 0.06)

−0.24 (− 0.29, − 0.12)

  1. Results in bold indicate a p-value < 0.05 for difference in means tested using one-way ANOVA
  2. ES calculated using Cohen’s d. ES are interpreted as “Small” > 0.2–0.5, “Moderate” > 0.5–0.8, “Large” > 0.8