Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of the association between type of intervention and healthcare-seeking behavior in three case vignettes (N = 1039)

From: Know where to go: evidence from a controlled trial of a healthcare system information intervention among immigrants

 

ORa

(95% CI)

P-value

Flu-like symptoms

 Control Group

1.00

  

 Intervention Group I (Written Material)

1.51

(0.86–2.65)

0.148

 Intervention Group II (Course)

1.67

(0.99–2.83)

0.055

Chest pain (potential AMI)

 Control Group

1.00

  

 Intervention Group I (Written Material)

0.80

(0.43–1.48)

0.473

 Intervention Group II (Course)

1.39

(0.80–2.41)

0.238

Major depression

 Control Group

1.00

  

 Intervention Group I (Written Material)

1.00

(0.53–1.89)

0.990

 Intervention Group II (Course)

1.47

(0.78–2.79)

0.236

 

AORa

(95% CI)

P-value

Flu-like symptoms

 Control Group

1.00

  

 Intervention Group I (Written Material)b

1.54

(0.88–2.72)

0.133

 Intervention Group II (Course)b

1.71

(1.01–2.91)

0.047

 Control Group

1.00

  

 Intervention Group I (Written Material)c

1.63

(0.92–2.90)

0.094

 Intervention Group II (Course)c

1.74

(1.01–2.97)

0.044

 Control Group

1.00

  

 Intervention Group I (Written Material)d

1.59

(0.87–2.84)

0.120

 Intervention Group II (Course)d

1.74

(1.00–3.00)

0.048

  1. aThe change in the control group is an odds ratio that is the odds of right response at follow-up divided by the odds of right response at baseline. The change in the intervention groups is similarly given by an odds ratio. The ratio between the two odds ratios is an estimate of the true intervention effect
  2. bAdjusted for region of origin
  3. cAdjusted for migrant status
  4. dAdjusted for level of education