Skip to main content

Table 7 Non-fatal work injuries among immigrants compared to natives

From: A systematic review of working conditions and occupational health among immigrants in Europe and Canada

Author (ref number)

Sample, method, country, study period

Observed differences, immigrants compared with natives:

Ahonen and Benavides [14]

Recorded injuries. General working pop., Spain, 2003

Non-fatal injuries: RR 3.9, 95%CI 3.9–3.9(m) and RR 5.4, 95%CI 5.4–5.5 (w).

Alexe DM et al. [16]

Farm injuries, database run by four major hospitals, Greece, 1996–2000

PR = 23% of the injuries ended with hospitalization vs 14% among Greek farm worker

Biering, et al. [20]

Recorded injuries. General working pop., Denmark, 2003–2013

OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.87–1.00 (old EU and Western)

OR 1.13, 95%CI 1.02–1.24 (new EU countries)

OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.48–1.64 (rest of the world).

Connel et al. [29]

Patients with eye injuries at an accident and emergency clinic, Ireland, 2006–8

48% of all injuries observed among immigrants their proportion of the work-force was 9%).

Davidson and Orr [31]

Case study of plastic surgery patients, Ireland, 2006/7

40% of all injuries observed among foreign nationals.

Frickman et al. [40]

Emergency department data, Switzerland, 2001–11

66% of all injuries observed among immigrants (> twice the proportion of foreigners in the pop.).

Gravseth et al. [85]

Patients’ records from an Accident and Emergency department, Norway, 2001

30% of all injuries observed among immigrants (their proportion of the work-force was 12%)

Manstrangel et al. [50]

Patients records from an Accident and Emergency department, Italy, 2004

ERR# = 1.68 (109.1 per 1000 compared with 65 per 1000 among Italians)a

Premji et al. [59]

General working pop., aggregated work injuries by occupation, Canada, 2000–2

Ta = 0.08NS (% immigrants) / Ta = 0.16a (% recent immigrants)

Saeed et al. [65]

Patients admitted with ocular trauma in Ireland, 2001 and 2006–7

ERR# = 13.4 (134 per 100.000 vs 10 per 100.000 natives)a

Salminen et al. [66]

Self-reported injury among bus drivers, Finland, 2005–6

ERR# = 0.68 (77.5 per 1000 employees 113.6)NS

Salvatore et al. [67]

Self-reported work injuries in the general working pop., Italy, 2007

RR 1.82, 95%CI 1.53–2.16 (m) and RR 1.20, 95%CI 0.81–1.79 (w)

Sattler et al. [68]

Hand injuries presenting to the Dep. Of Plastic Surgery, 2000–05, Ireland

The patient numbers from the new EU countries increased from 18 (2.4%) to 41 (4.9%).

Smith and Mustard [71]

Self-reported work injuries, general working pop., Canada, 2003 and 2005

OR 2.08, 95%CI 1.02–4.2.5

Thurston and Verhoef [88]

Self-reported work injuries, convenience sample of immigrants,., Canada, 1994

ERR# = 1.70 (Lost-time injury 6.0% of person years worked vs 3.6%. among natives).

Tiagi [78]

Work injuries by occupation in the General working pop. in Canada, 2011

ERR# = 0.97, 69 vs 71 per 10,000NS

  1. OR Odds ratio, RR relative risk, PR prevalence (%), ERRa estimated relative risk based on the reported prevalence of incidence number reported in the paper, Ta Kendall’s Tau, PR prevalence (%)
  2. astatistically significant. NS not statistically significant, m men, w women, n/a not available