Table 3 Comparison of T2DM and HT by participants’ characteristics
Characteristic | T2DM | χ2 | p-value | HT | χ2 | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (%) | No (%) | Yes (%) | No (%) | |||||
Sex | ||||||||
 Male | 66 (17.3) | 316 (82.7) | 0.13 | 0.712 | 164 (41.7) | 229 (58.3) | 4.52 | 0.034* |
 Female | 64 (16.3) | 329 (83.7) |  |  | 197 (49.3) | 203 (50.7) |  |  |
Age (years) | ||||||||
 60-69 | 75 (18.8) | 324 (81.2) | 2.49 | 0.287 | 173 (42.2) | 237 (57.8) | 4.25 | 0.119 |
 70-79 | 39 (14.3) | 234 (85.7) |  |  | 134 (48.0) | 145 (52.0) |  |  |
 ≥80 | 16 (15.5) | 87 (84.5) |  |  | 54 (51.9) | 50 (48.1) |  |  |
Tribe | ||||||||
 Akha | 11 (8.6) | 117 (91.4) | 24.48 | <0.001* | 61 (46.9) | 69 (53.1) | 26.45 | <0.001* |
 Lahu | 26 (19.5) | 107 (80.5) |  |  | 61 (45.9) | 72 (54.1) |  |  |
 Hmong | 11 (8.1) | 124 (91.9) |  |  | 42 (30.0) | 98 (70.0) |  |  |
 Yao | 26 (21.5) | 95 (78.5) |  |  | 74 (56.9) | 56 (43.1) |  |  |
 Karen | 34 (26.4) | 95 (73.6) |  |  | 52 (40.0) | 78 (60.0) |  |  |
 Lisu | 22 (17.1) | 107 (82.9) |  |  | 71 (54.6) | 59 (45.4) |  |  |