Table 3 Measures of impact for pathway #10
From: Modelling the impact of social protection on tuberculosis: the S-PROTECT project
Level 1: Impact of CCT like BFP on Household Socioeconomic Status (SES) | |||||||
HH SES indicator | Measure of impact | Baseline | Follow up | Effect | |||
Monthly total expenditure | % point difference | $420,778 | $476,741 | 13% [31] | |||
Monthly total household expenditure | % point difference | S/.108 | S/.144 | 33% [32] | |||
Monthly total household income | % point difference | S/.90 | S/.129 | 43% [32] | |||
Level 2: Impact on household SES on nutrition | |||||||
HH SES indicator | Malnutrition indicator | Measure of impact | Baseline | Follow up | Effect | ||
Monthly household income | Rise in BMI associated with household income between 2 and 5 minimum wages (US$ 290 to US$ 1450) relative to household income less than 2 minimum wages (US$ 290) | Unit increase | – | – | 0.8 [33] | ||
Monthly equivalent household income | Rise in BMI associated with a monthly household income increase of MEX$ 1000 | Unit increase | – | – | 0.12 [34] | ||
Level 3: Impact of nutrition on TB | |||||||
Malnutrition indicator | TB indicator | Measure of impact | Baseline | Follow up | Effect | ||
TB disease | TB diagnosis delay | TB treatment success | |||||
Odds of patients with BMI < 18.5 defaulting treatment relative to patients with BMI 18.5 to 24.9 | ● | Odds ratio | – | – | 2.08 [35] | ||
Odds of patients weighing < 60 kg experiencing > 30 days patient delay | ● | Odds ratio | – | – | 3.45 [36] | ||
Hazard ratio for TB mortality of BMI < 18 kg/m2 at treatment beginning | ● | Hazard ratio | – | – | 4.89 [37] | ||
Decrease in TB incidence per unit increase in BMI (BMI range of 18.5 to 30 kg/m2) | â—Ź | % point difference | 14% [38] | ||||