Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate analysis on factors associated with uptake of CHTC

From: Use of a counsellor supported disclosure model to improve the uptake of couple HIV testing and counselling in Kenya: a quasi-experimental study

Outcome variable

Categories

Odds Ratio

95% CI

P value

Adj. Odds Ratio

95% CI

P value

Study arm

 Control

Reference

     

 Intervention

0.2

(0.098–0.42)

0.000*

8.01

(2.75–23.32)

0.000*

Age (years)

 18–24

Reference

     

 25–34

1.24

(0.76–1.2)

0.139

0.92

(0.33–2.51)

0.866

 35–44

0.72

(0.25–2.12)

0.553

0.71

(0.2–2.59)

0.607

 45 and above

1

a

a

a

a

a

Sex of participant

 Female

Reference

     

 Male

1.16

(0.80–1.69)

0.426

1.25

(0.58–2.68)

0.569

Occupation of participant

 Unemployed

Reference

     

 Employed

0.65716

(0.65715–0.65718)

0.000*

0.55

(0.22–1.35)

0.192

Marital status

 Never married

Reference

     

 Married

0.54

(0.51–0.57)

0.000*>

1.16

(0.46–2.89)

0.757

 Widowed/separated/divorced

1.11

(0.65–1.87)

0.703

3.25

(0.59–17.78)

0.174

Education

 Primary education and below

Reference

     

 Secondary education

0.47

(0.12–1.92)

0.294

0.47

(0.16–1.4)

0.175

 Tertiary

1.52

(1.39–1.67)

0.000*

0.58

(0.18–1.84)

0.354

Knowledge of partner’s status

 No

Reference

     

 Yes

0.65

(0.22–1.96)

0.446

1.06

(0.41–2.77)

0.905

 Not sure if status has changed

2.37

(1.07–5.23)

0.03*

1.71

(0.48–6.05)

0.408

Willingness to invite partner for a HIV test

 No

Reference

     

 Yes

0.74

(0.2–2.7)

0.646

0.92

(0.26–3.32)

0.901

Willingness to test together with partner

 No

Reference

     

 Yes

0.44

(0.34–0.58)

0.000*

1.19

(0.25–5.65)

0.831

  1. Note: *p < 0.05. The odds ratio are adjusted for the study arms
  2. avalues omitted from the model