Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of responses between the four groups of expertise, in all rounds

From: Indicators for evaluating European population health: a Delphi selection process

Round

Area of concern

Indicator

Field of expertise

EHS

EHESS

ESMPH

HGDS

1

ESE

Population who reported crime, violence or vandalism in the area of residence

 

 

PHE

Annual mean concentrations of Particulate Matter - PM2.5 (ug/m3)

|□

 

PHE

Annual mean concentrations of Particulate Matter - PM10 (ug/m3)

|□

 

PHE

Annual mean ozone concentrations

|□|▲|♦

PHE

Annual mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration

|□

□|▲

PHE

Annual mean Sulphur Dioxide concentration

|□

□|▲

PHE

Number of high temperature days

|□

|▲

▲|♦

□|♦

PHE

Number of low temperature days

  

PHE

Number of warm nights

|□

|▲

▲|♦

□|♦

PHE

Number of heatwaves

|□

|▲

▲|♦

□|♦

PHE

Heating degree days

|□

□|♦

2

ESE

Gross Domestic Product, per capita in Purchasing Power Standards (PPS)

 

 

ESE

Early leavers from education and training (%)

  

3

HO

Sex ratio of life expectancy at birth

 

|□

HO

Sex ratio of premature mortality

 

|□

HO

Sex ratio of amenable mortality

 

 

HO

Deaths related to dementias including Alzheimer’s disease, SDR per 100.000 inhabitants

  

  1. EHS Economics and health systems, EHESS Environmental health, ecological systems and sustainability, ESMPH Epidemiology, social medicine and public health, HGDS Health geography, demography and sociology. The symbols identify the groups where responses were found to be statistically different. Pairs of equal symbols identify the groups where panelist’s response differ significantly from each other. Example: the responses given by the EHS group of panelists (|□) on the indicator “Annual mean concentrations of Particulate Matter – PM2.5 (ug/m3)” differed significantly from the answers presented by the EHESS () and the HGDS (□) groups