Implementation of the Good School Toolkit in Uganda: a quantitative process evaluation of a successful violence prevention program

Table 6 Student factors associated with experience of physical violence from staff at endline

Student factors	Unadjusted Physical violence from staff towards students.	Adjusted Physical violence from staff towards students.
	OR (95% CI) p-value	aOR (95% CI) p-value
Number of students in model	n = 1921	n = 1920
Exposure to Toolkit (factor score)	0.76 (0.67-0.86) < 0.001	0.82 (0.72-0.93) 0.001
Female sex	1.38 (1.12-1.70) 0.002	1.31 (1.05-1.62) 0.015
Self-reported functional difficulty with memory and/or concentration	1.38 (1.04-1.84) 0.028	NA (1)
Self-reported functional difficulty with self-care (e.g. washing)	3.68 (1.51-8.95) 0.004	3.36 (1.31-8.60) 0.011
Eaten three or more meals yesterday	0.67 (0.53-0.84) < 0.001	0.74 (0.59-0.94) 0.012
Any other violence experienced in the last year (2)	2.27 (1.82-2.84) < 0.001	2.00 (1.60-2.52) < 0.001
Poorer mental health (3)	3.69 (2.45-5.57) < 0.001	2.51 (1.63-3.85) < 0.001

Notation: aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NA Not Applicable. (1) Self-reported functional difficulty with memory and/or concentration removed from the final multivariate model due to co-linearity with the mental health measure. (2) Any other violence experience in the last year besides physical violence from school staff. (3) Poorer mental health ranging from 0 (low difficulties) to 2 (high difficulties)
Legend: unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models are presented, both accounting for school clustering by fitting school as a fixed effect. Adjusted model includes all other student factors as covariates in the model

ISSN: 1471-2458