Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression analyses association of demographic variables, in relation to FGM/C health care-seeking

From: Health care-seeking patterns for female genital mutilation/cutting among young Somalis in Norway

Health care-seeking for FGM/C

Demographic variables

Univariate analysis (unadjusted)

Model 1 (Adjusted)

Model 2 (Adjusted)

  

aAIC = 89.97

aAIC = 89.91

OR (95% CI)

P -value

OR (95% CI)

P -value

OR (95% CI)

P -value

Age at migration to Norway

 0 to 11 years

1

 

1

 

1

 

  ≥ 12 years

3.25 (1.13, 9.34)

0.03

2.85 (0.87, 9.41)

0.09

3.18 (1.02, 9.98)

0.05

Marital status

 Single

1

 

1

 

1

 

 Married

2.54 (0.79, 8.13)

0.12

3.99 (0.98, 16.24)

0.053

3.43 (0.90, 13.17)

0.07

 Divorce

–

–

–

–

–

–

Education

 University

1

 

1

 

1

 

 Secondary

0.49 (0.13, 1.80)

0.29

0.28 (0.06, 1.41)

0.12

0.35 (0.08, 1.61)

0.18

 Primary

0.32 (0.06, 1.62)

0.17

0.18 (0.03, 1.24)

0.08

0.26 (0.04, 1.51)

0.13

No formal education

–

–

–

–

–

–

Stigmatized of FGM/C practice

 No

1

 

1

 

1

 

 Yes

3.75 (1.26, 11.14)

0.02

5.03 (1.33, 18.94)

0.02

5.10 (1.46, 17.79)

0.01

Age

 16 to 20 years

1

 

1

   

 21 to 25 years

1.10 (0.36, 3.36)

0.87

0.44 (0.10, 1.87)

0.27

  

Support of FGM/C practice

 No

1

 

1

   

 Yes

2.14 (0.54, 8.53)

0.28

1.52 (0.29, 7.93)

0.62

  
  1. Model 1 is a full adjustment for all main demographic variables
  2. Model 2 is based on variables that have P ≤ 0.20 in the univariate analyses
  3. aModel selection was based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) which states that a model with a smaller AIC estimate fits the data better. Therefore, based on the AIC, model 2 was selected