Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A methodological framework for the evaluation of syndromic surveillance systems: a case study of England

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross Sparks
17 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Don Olson
11 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Felipe J Colón-González
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross Sparks
26 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Felipe J Colón-González
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Felipe J Colón-González
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
24 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12889-018-5422-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement