Skip to main content

Table 4 General Statistics of main independent variables

From: Why are some groups physically active and others not? A contrast group analysis in leisure settings

Independent Variable

N

Physical Activity Level (M: mean)

SD

Sig.a

Effect size

Observational setting

 Entringen Pool

328

2.57

1.032

.381 (n.s.)

0.062 (Cohen’s d)

 Champagne Pond

579

2.64

1.192

Gender-related group composition

 Female

208

2.39

0.734

.000

0.119 (part. Eta squared)

 Male

111

1.70

1.014

 Mixed

588

2.87

1.172

Group size (categories)

 2–3 members (1)

489

2.15

0.962

.000

0.119 (part. Eta squared)

 4–5 members (2)

316

3.08

1.177

 6 and more members (3)

102

3.39

0.706

Age -related group composition (specific)

 Adults only

644

2.49

1.145

.000

0.095 (part. Eta squared)

 Age-mixed

190

3.25

1.006

 Children

34

1.85

0.436

 Adolescents

38

2.24

0.675

Age-related group composition (homogeneous/ heterogeneous)

 Age-homogeneous

781

2.45

1.104

.000

1.236 (Cohen’s d)

 Age-heterogeneous

126

3.62

0.757

Body shape-related group composition

 Mainly Athletic

69

1.35

0.855

.000

0.259 (part. Eta squared)

 Mainly Normal-weight

408

2.27

1.135

 Mixed

252

2.96

0.815

 Mainly Obese

178

3.42

0.848

Additional equipment

 Yes

474

3.12

1.012

.000

1.053 (Cohen’s d)

 No

433

2.06

1.001

Communication level within group

 1 (frequent and lively)

398

3.25

0.880

.000

0.303 (part. Eta squared)

 2 (occasional)

346

2.36

1.009

 

 3 (almost none)

161

1.60

0.990

Day of observation

 Workday

474

2.46

1.124

.000

- 0.293 (Cohen’s d)

 Weekend

433

2.79

1.127

  1. n.s Not significant
  2. aSignificance level after Bonferroni correction: p = 0.05/24 = 0.00208