Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Influence of premium vs masked cigarette brand names on the experienced taste of a cigarette after tobacco plain packaging in Australia: an experimental study

  • Gemma Skaczkowski1,
  • Sarah Durkin1,
  • Yoshihisa Kashima2 and
  • Melanie Wakefield1Email author
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:295

Received: 8 September 2017

Accepted: 22 February 2018

Published: 12 March 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Sep 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marwa Fawzi
9 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Omolade Femi-Ajao
13 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adnan Fakir
12 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gemma Skaczkowski
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Yang
20 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mehwish Hussain
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
12 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12889-018-5200-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
University of Melbourne, School of Psychological Sciences, Melbourne, Australia