Skip to main content

Table 3 Marginal effects from sex-stratified fixed-effects probit regression models of the impact of state tobacco control policies on smokeless tobacco and cigar use (N = 499,381)

From: Impact of tobacco control policies on adolescent smokeless tobacco and cigar use: a difference-in-differences approach

 

Smokeless tobacco

Cigars

 

Mean

%a Use

Marginal effect of coefficientb,c

95% CI

p Value

Mean

%a Use

Marginal effect of coefficientb,d

95% CI

p Value

Males (N = 240,733)

12.3%

  

16.8%

  

 Tobacco tax (%)

 

0.0001 (−0.0001-0.0002)

.5

 

0.0001 (−0.0002-0.0004)

.4

 Cigarette tax (%)

 

0.0010 (0.0003-0.0017)

.008

 

0.0015 (0.0006-0.0024)

.001

 100% smoke-free restaurants (yes/no)

 

0.0105 (0.0015-0.0194)

.02

 

−0.0062 (− 0.0154-0.0030)

.2

Females (N = 258,648)

2.0%

  

7.7%

  

 Tobacco tax (%)

 

−0.0000 (− 0.0001-0.0000)

.3

 

0.0002 (− 0.0001-0.0004)

.1

 Cigarette tax (%)

 

0.0003 (−0.0000-0.0006)

.09

 

0.0007 (0.0001-0.0013)

.02

 100% smoke-free restaurants (yes/no)

 

0.0002 (−0.0042-0.0046)

0.9

 

−0.0002 (− 0.0070-0.0065)

.9

  1. CI confidence interval
  2. a Weighted
  3. b Model includes adjustment for the following covariates: cigarette use, state tobacco control expenditure, age, race, state, and year
  4. c Model includes adjustment for cigar use
  5. d Model includes adjustment for smokeless tobacco use