Ethnicity and socioeconomic status are related to dietary patterns at age 5 in the Amsterdam born children and their development (ABCD) cohort

Table 4 Mean dietary pattern scores by socioeconomic status in the ABCD cohort (n = 2769)

Dietary pattern	Low SES		Middle SES		High SES		P value
Dietary pattern	Mean	SE	Mean	SE	Mean	SE	ANOVA
Snacking
Model 1: Crude	0.864	0.052^a	0.171	0.030^a	−0.297	0.024^a	<0.01
Model 2: Ethnicity	0.590	0.054^a	0.137	0.029^a	−0.216	0.024^a	<0.01
Model 3: Fully adjusted	0.591	0.054^a	0.134	0.029^a	−0.214	0.024^a	<0.01
Full-fat
Model 1: Crude	−0.179	0.056^b	−0.026	0.032	0.055	0.026^c	<0.01
Model 2: Ethnicity	−0.217	0.060^b	−0.028	0.032	0.065	0.027^c	<0.01
Model 3: Fully adjusted	−0.213	0.060^b	−0.025	0.032	0.061	0.027^c	<0.01
Meat
Model 1: Crude	0.229^b	0.056	0.098	0.032^b	−0.114	0.026^a	<0.01
Model 2: Ethnicity	0.242	0.060^b	0.096	0.032^b	−0.115	0.026^a	<0.01
Model 3: Fully adjusted	0.231	0.060^b	0.093	0.032^b	−0.111	0.026^a	<0.01
Healthy
Model 1: Crude	0.217	0.056^a	0.004	0.032^c	−0.049	0.026^c	<0.01
Model 2: Ethnicity	0.025	0.059	−0.019	0.031	0.008	0.026	0.716
Model 3: Fully adjusted	0.043	0.059	−0.019	0.031	0.003	0.026	0.618

SES was based on maternal educational: low SES (<6y), middle SES (6-10y) and high SES (>10y) post-primary education.
Mean, SE pattern scores per dietary pattern by socioeconomic group.
Mean pattern scores for the total group was set to 0.000, based on PCA method.
Model 1: unadjusted.
Model 2: adjusted for ethnicity.
Model 3: adjusted for ethnicity, age, gender and maternal age.
Sign (P < 0.01) is based on ANOVA and Post-hoc Bonferroni.
^asign with all groups
^bsign with high SES group
^csign with low SES group

ISSN: 1471-2458